TWG LVI: Silence Will Fall

[Bubbles]

Just clarifying I came into the game thinking that once you vote you cant change it, but I'm guessing you can

[fank009]

Im going to sit here patiently until someone says verm is a confirmed human, his idea is so good.

In the meantime, how about for day one, wè have a kitb between 3 of the most suspicious people instead

-bubbles, you can change it, its just not worth changing it

[vermilionvermin]

verm is a confirmed human his idea is so good

[Bubbles]

If there can only be a maximum of 4 votes on a player, what happens if a 5th person votes? Will it be considered them not voting and their vote will be randomized?

[TheZeldaPianist275]

Ohaidere.

Methinks Verm's idea is a good one, and I don't foresee any huge problems with the vote scatter toward the end of the phase.

[FSM-Reapr]

If there can only be a maximum of 4 votes on a player, what happens if a 5th person votes? Will it be considered them not voting and their vote will be randomized?

Correct.

I'm trying to understand this voting thing. So once we vote we can change our vote the same phase, but after that we can't go back to the first person we chose ever, even in the same phase?

Correct again!

[BlackDragonSlayer]

I've been so wrapped up in the LLF game...

Is this a good idea: The vigi vigi's inactive people if there are no people of suspicion; this forces the wolves to be active, and hopefully, we can gather more information from them that way... plus, it "encourages" some more humans to be active.

The seer should trust anybody whom they seer blue- since there are no blue wolves in this game- correct?

[FSM-Reapr]

The seer should trust anybody whom they seer blue- since there are no blue wolves in this game- correct?

Are you seriously asking me are there any blue wolves in the game?

[BlackDragonSlayer]

Are you seriously asking me are there any blue wolves in the game?

I should hope not! That's why I used dashes instead of commas (e.g. the question is "The seer should trust anybody whom they seer blue, correct?" with "since there are no blue wolves in this game" added as an informative statement, albeit something that could be left out).

[FSM-Reapr]

k good

carry on then

[fank009]

I've been so wrapped up in the LLF game...

Is this a good idea: The vigi vigi's inactive people if there are no people of suspicion; this forces the wolves to be active, and hopefully, we can gather more information from them that way... plus, it "encourages" some more humans to be active.

The seer should trust anybody whom they seer blue- since there are no blue wolves in this game- correct?

bds, think about this game, think about why there is a vig, and think about why your plan is a bad idea.

[BlackDragonSlayer]

bds, think about this game, think about why there is a vig, and think about why your plan is a bad idea.

There's a vigi so that people who a lot of people have voted for can still be killed. If nobody fits that bill, or nobody is suspicious enough to warrant them being killed, then it's like taking a shot in the dark when it comes to vigi'ing people... which is why I suggested my plan in the first place...

[fank009]

That plan is a good plan bds, vigging the inactives so that there is a strongish group come lylo.

[FSM-Reapr]

Answering questions:

-Vigilante can vote like a Silent. (S)He doesn't have any vote restrictions.

-If a player is wolfed and he's targeted by the seer the same night, I will provide the seering results.

[Waddle Bro]

Waddle Bro, I don't think anyone should be changing their votes, that just increases the number of people that you can't vote for. If we can all communicate and discuss the lynch, we won't need to do any fancy plan.

I never said that anyone should change their votes. By scattering the votes, we make sure later there's a greater chance that no one would be unavailable as a lynching candidate later in the game.

So far I've seen lots of comments about Verm's idea being good and that seer and vigi should keep a low profile. What about my scattering votes idea? It seems you guys are ignoring that. Also I'd like to hear your seering suggestions, because the communication is the only way we can determine who's wolfish and who's not. I'd like to hear your opinions about everything.

Here's what I'd do as a seer:
I wouldn't seer someone who's acting suspiciously, instead I'd seer someone who's good in this game to see are they blue or not. That would open up a possibility to a strong alliance. Let's say you seer someone suspicious and he'd turn out red. What would you do about it? You'd encourage the lynch like any other player. What if he turned out being green? You could be labeled as suspicious for trying to prevent a lynch of a suspicious player, or not, since there's a chance he could be the Master Wolf.
But if you'd seer someone helpful green/blue, that could open up a chance for a strong alliance.
That's how I see it, imo we need to plan carefully our every move.


also vigi tom nook
I don't support viging inactives, instead I'd give them a chance to be active.