TWG 45: BOWSER'S BIG BLAST

[Thiannon]

You guys safety early and often! I guess it is Christmas, though.

Anyway, my new Day 1 strategy of voting off someone nobody thinks looks suspicious (hi Mashi) doesn't really work in a Manhunt. I do, however, think that we should work away from voting for someone that looks too "wolfy", because the obvious strategy in this or any manhunt is to fade into the background for at least the first few phases.

Have you guys played (m)any manhunts here? Because I don't believe I ever have myself. Basically, I'm wondering what the human success rate is on NSM and what strategies have and haven't worked.

[Hakan]

Voting for Kman as safety, or what?

It's usually a good idea to say reasons before voting, or else people will get suspicious of you. 

because this



On a serious note, no one here knows what the meaning of a safety vote is, so I am revoking my vote from Kman. Safeties are for when you are busy for the rest of the day phase and don't know it=f you'll have time to come back. You don't just safety because you feel like it.

That Thiannon feller is pretty suspicious, as always.

[Toby]

I highly suggest a BDS lynch right now, he's said a lot of silly things that HE THINKS could add up to make him human, on my phone so quoting will be hard but from memory things like this:

"Haha BOWSER, you'll never catch me with phantoms!"

"If I were bowser and mean, I'd choose the exploding switch"

"If I were a wolf I would be sensible...."

And if you re-read the first 5 pages as I was doing yesterday, you'll see how noob-like, over-active, and different he is playing.



(No offence if your actually human)

[SlowPokemon]

also safety Kman because reasons stated before and I haven't read the thread through yet.

Are you stupid? You can't safety on someone who has A vote, let alone two.

Also changing vote to The Boy Who Cried Wolf, there's no real reason to lynch BDS yet beyond him making stupid jokes and using an annoying amount of smileys. And really, all new players are like that.

Right now, Bubbles and Waddle Bro are my other suspicions.

[blueflower999]

Are you stupid? You can't safety on someone who has A vote, let alone two.

He probably just posted without reading the thread. No need to call him stupid... 

I realize that in the past, BDS has been one of my topic suspects. In almost every game. However, I'm starting to think that this is just his playing style. (and his untimely ability to always be Seer'd red) Yet again, this game he seems to be hyperactive and making weird comments, which could be his way of disguising his "wolfy-ness", if that makes sense. I won't vote for him, though, because I've been wrong in the past, and it could be that I'm just always suspicious of his playing style.

Knowing this, I'll take a safety on Hakan

[Toby]

Too many safety's! Haha.

Also Slowpoke, I don't think on day 1 there can ever be a real reason to vote someone.

[Waddle Bro]

Are you stupid? You can't safety on someone who has A vote, let alone two.

Like I said I didn't read the thread through yet so I didn't know Kman had other votes. >.>

Safety on Waddle Bro.

[SlowPokemon]

All right, just in the future don't vote until reading through the thread. It's cost us the game before.

[Waddle Bro]

I know how this works.

I can also name the game when that happened; Perfect Apples by Spyro.

/totes not a showoff lol

[SlowPokemon]

Nope, I was talking about an old game. :p if you know how it works then you shouldn't do it.

Okay, I'm over it. Wasn't a huge deal to begin with.

[Bubbles]

On a serious note, no one here knows what the meaning of a safety vote is, so I am revoking my vote from Kman. Safeties are for when you are busy for the rest of the day phase and don't know it=f you'll have time to come back. You don't just safety because you feel like it.

This. Theres no reason to get upset about them, unless you have multiple ones (which shouldnt happen anyway). Though you should probably know that I think you currently still have a vote on Kman, since I cant remember the exact rules for unvoting.

And BDS I tried reading your post but it was too confusing

2: I read what you said, but did you not read what I said before and after what you said?

3: That does not mean abiding in no way by logic.

[EFitTrainr]

Safety on shadowkirby

[Hakan]

Well that's how we do it for where I usually play TWG. Saws or Mashi or Nighthawk can correct me otherwise.

[Kman96]

Oh my gosh, everyone is talking about me.

I don't really see it as a big deal that people are safety-ing/voting for me, but I will tell you that I'm human, and you'd know that as soon as I explode/am lynched. That seems to be the only way we can truly identify who is human- by who dies. as soon as we lynch the person who ISN'T human would anything change (i.e. Game's over)

As such, I guess it's only logical for someone to be up for sacrifice, seeing as there's only one wolf and like 16 humans. That's nuts.



P.S. As far as I can tell, BDS always manages to mess things up in a TWG...at least, it appears that's what he's done for the TWG's I've skimmed since I last played...What's your deal, man? Y u gotta be all over everyone?

I'll say I'm human again, not that it'll make any difference. and that goes for everyone.

Well that's how we do it for where I usually play TWG. Saws or Mashi or Nighthawk can correct me otherwise.

Watch your mouth. Don't be using that LLF language here.

[EFitTrainr]

Watch your mouth. Don't be using that LLF language here.

I agree