Anime and Manga suggestions.

[Jompa]

That is the funniest thing I ever saw today To the max!

[Jompa]

YEEEEESSSSS

FUCK YEAH!!!!!! THEY'RE MAKING A SECOND SEASON OF "LITTLE BUSTERS!"

HOLY CRAP, CAN'T WAIT!!!!!!!!



In other news, White Album will also get another anime so that's cool.

[Pit0010]

omg did anyone hear about this fairy tail anime news??

[Jompa]

It is, today, one entire year since "Uchuu Kyoudai", the greatest show ever, started airing.
And it still is magnificent, even now at episode 52!
I hope this show will continue on forever!

[Dude]

lmaooooo

[Jompa]

I actually liked it.

[GaryOak]

MAL score 4,68? That's pretty damn bad.

[Jompa]

Jesus, everyone only cares about the animation - I read some reviews before I watched it, and all they did was comparing the animation to the manga, which I've never heard of - so my point is at least neutral.
I think all those reviews are gone now, though.

As I said, I actually liked it. And I hate how animation always plays such a big role for so many people.

[SuperFireKirby]

Well its kinda everything you're seeing, so it tends to be kind of an important factor.

[Jompa]

Yeah, it is "anime" after all - but it is a bad thing if that stops you from enjoying a master piece..
A friend of mine, is a painter, and he refuses to watch anything that where the animation wasn't the prime focus point. And on many occasions he has turned down great anime, and instead gone to re-watch Death Note for the sixth time. He doesn't give a shit about the story, he just wanna stare at colorful images.

[SlowPokemon]

^whats wrong with that? The most important thing to me is the music score. Why can't other people be focused on the art style?

[Jompa]

Because animation should not be more important than story.

[SlowPokemon]

It can be. Everybody likes things for different reasons.

[Jompa]

Sure, it can be, but is it really a good show then? And I don't mean: "yeah, the story is great, but the animation is greater," I mean "the story sucks but the animation is good".
Can one say that the show in discussion, Aku no Hana, is bad just because one thinks the animation is bad, after watching the first episode? From what I've heard, the manga is great. Wouldn't an adaption be great as well, if they go with the same story? I don't think the manga was supported by its art (it is pretty fair, if you are picky) so the story must be good then?
Then the anime probably is good.

Everybody likes things for different reasons. Definitely! OST plays a big role for me too (but that is different in the way that you don't really listen to the OST before watching). I basically don't like when people let one reason play too big of a role.
Animation should be good! This is anime we're talking about, and to show of quality and to attract an audience, the animation is one of the main factors.

The Aku no Hana adaption probably is great, once it gets further into the story. But there are people who would immediately say "oh my god, what a terrible show, what are these narrow-eyed mongolids? I would rather go back to watching pink haired alien girls talking about how to eat a chocolate cornet".
I would have no trouble with people dismissing it for being boring, but that's not the point of that video, is it? And that's not why it is being reviewed for being bad - it is people's picky-ness about the animation.
I have seen reviews about it being good too! One guy praised it for adapting the manga well. This just proves that if ones mind is willing to accept the animation, regardless of how it is, and just enjoy the good show, nothing but positive things will come from it! Which means that letting the animation play the crucial role in a case where the animation is different (because the animation in Aku no Hana is just different anyways, not bad - actually pretty good) - anyways, deciding an anime is bad because of the animation is a bad thing.
It is basic "judging the book by its cover"-rules.

[SuperFireKirby]

<Anyone wanna guess what I decided to start watching?