[Wii] Kirby's Epic Yarn - "Blub-Blub Ocean" by mastersuperfan

Started by Zeta, June 25, 2020, 04:08:30 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Zeta

Submission Information:

Series: Kirby
Game: Kirby's Epic Yarn
Console: Nintendo Wii
Title: Blub-Blub Ocean
Instrumentation Solo Piano
Arranger: mastersuperfan

[attachment deleted by admin]

[attachment deleted by admin]

mastersuperfan

Quote from: NocturneOfShadow on February 11, 2016, 03:00:36 PMthere's also a huge difference in quality between 2000 songs and 2010 songs
Quote from: Latios212 on February 11, 2016, 03:29:24 PMThe difference between 2000 songs and 2010 songs is 10 songs.

Latios212

Yay! It's been a while since our last new KEY sheet ;D great job on this one!

- m. 12 is missing an E on beat 4 (LH)
- I think the last eighth rest in m. 13 should be moved up to the same height as the previous one
- Lower inner tie in m. 20 could probably have its left endpoint moved right a bit
- I think the chord in m. 20 should have an E in it (above the LH A).
- Measure 22 miiiight have an E in the same place on beat 1...
- I think the first chord in m. 23 is missing its seventh (A in LH)
My arrangements and YouTube channel!

Quote from: Dudeman on February 22, 2016, 10:16:37 AM
who needs education when you can have WAIFUS!!!!!

Spoiler
[close]
turtle

mastersuperfan

Quote from: NocturneOfShadow on February 11, 2016, 03:00:36 PMthere's also a huge difference in quality between 2000 songs and 2010 songs
Quote from: Latios212 on February 11, 2016, 03:29:24 PMThe difference between 2000 songs and 2010 songs is 10 songs.

Static

A couple more things:

- m10 LH is also missing an E on beat 4.
- m19 RH is missing a Cn on beat 2.5 (C augmented 7th in 3rd inversion aka C7#5/Bb)

mastersuperfan

Quote from: Static on June 26, 2020, 01:09:35 PMA couple more things:

- m10 LH is also missing an E on beat 4.
- m19 RH is missing a Cn on beat 2.5 (C augmented 7th in 3rd inversion aka C7#5/Bb)

Got 'em
Quote from: NocturneOfShadow on February 11, 2016, 03:00:36 PMthere's also a huge difference in quality between 2000 songs and 2010 songs
Quote from: Latios212 on February 11, 2016, 03:29:24 PMThe difference between 2000 songs and 2010 songs is 10 songs.

Latios212

My arrangements and YouTube channel!

Quote from: Dudeman on February 22, 2016, 10:16:37 AM
who needs education when you can have WAIFUS!!!!!

Spoiler
[close]
turtle

Static

The only other thing I have to say is that the text size on everything seems really small because you scaled the entire page down... It's not like you don't have room to make it a little larger, like 13 or 14pt.

Edit: I'd actually just scale everything up to 85%, 81% is just a little too small for reading Maestro font. I know it'll look a little more cramped but that's fine - you want people to be able to read the music easily. I know I'm guilty of making tiny music before, but I try to limit myself to 85% now after Libera suggested it awhile ago. When you actually print it out (or use one of those technological devices) and read it, it can really make a difference.

mastersuperfan

I scaled it down to 81% because I physically can't go any higher without overflowing onto two pages. I also don't like to go below 85% if I don't need to, but I found it preferable to having 1-2 systems and a bunch of empty space on a second page.
Quote from: NocturneOfShadow on February 11, 2016, 03:00:36 PMthere's also a huge difference in quality between 2000 songs and 2010 songs
Quote from: Latios212 on February 11, 2016, 03:29:24 PMThe difference between 2000 songs and 2010 songs is 10 songs.

mastersuperfan

Quote from: NocturneOfShadow on February 11, 2016, 03:00:36 PMthere's also a huge difference in quality between 2000 songs and 2010 songs
Quote from: Latios212 on February 11, 2016, 03:29:24 PMThe difference between 2000 songs and 2010 songs is 10 songs.

Static

I would still prefer 85%, but this is good enough. I know you really want to keep this on one page.

Zeta

This submission has been accepted by Static.

~Zeta, your friendly NSM-Bot