TWG CXXI: True Love Game Thread

Started by Oricorio, March 07, 2024, 06:00:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Oricorio

</3 True Love </3

Wolves:
1. Wolf Lover
2. Wolf Lover
Town:
3. Town Lover
4. Town Lover
5. Town Lover
6. Town Lover
7. Town Lover
8. Town Lover

Mechanics:
  • </3Basically the setup True Love</3
  • </3Every player is placed in groups of two as lovers. Wolves are guaranteed to be paired with town</3
  • </3If a player is lynched, their lover dies as well</3
  • </3The game is played nightless</3
  • </3Town wins by killing all of the wolves, wolves win when they're 50% of remaining players</3

Role PMs:
Spoiler
You are a Town Lover. Your lover is _____, and if they die you will die as well. You win by eliminating all wolves.

You are a Wolf Lover. Your lover is _____, and if they die you will die as well. You win if wolves make up half the remaining players.
[close]

Players:
1.</3 BDS </3
2.</3 ThatHiddenCharacter </3
3.</3 SpecsFlyer17 </3
4.</3 Nakah </3
5.</3 Raeko </3
6.</3 TheZeldaPianist275 </3
7.</3 mastersuperfan </3
8. </3 Toby </3

Oricorio

Okay, game begins now! Sorry for posting it in the wrong forum initially. I can extend the deadline by a couple minutes in case anyone cares, but for now phase ends in 48 hours.

ThatHiddenCharacter

Just to be clear, we are allowed to talk to our lovers in DMs, right? (With the host included, of course.)
Discord server (We have continental breakfast): https://discord.gg/ZuFJBF4

Jointers Discord server (We have continental music):
https://discord.gg/ehHWckpTzn

Ko-fi page (I have continental continents):
https://ko-fi.com/thathiddencharacter

mastersuperfan

huzzah!

I haven't thought about the setup too too much but my first inclination is that it's beneficial for everyone to reveal their pairings...? since the wolves know each other, by default the wolves know 2 pairings for sure and can narrow down the remaining 4 players to 3 possible pairings. meanwhile humans start off knowing only their own lover, with I think 15 possible pairings among the remaining 6 players. so it seems to me like it's just best to reveal it all right away to ensure everyone has the same information.

I have thought briefly about whether there's some sort of information-sharing scheme where we could equalize everyone's information more without giving away everything to the wolves, but since the wolves start off with such a strict informational advantage, I'm skeptical such a scheme exists.

thoughts?
Quote from: NocturneOfShadow on February 11, 2016, 03:00:36 PMthere's also a huge difference in quality between 2000 songs and 2010 songs
Quote from: Latios212 on February 11, 2016, 03:29:24 PMThe difference between 2000 songs and 2010 songs is 10 songs.

mastersuperfan

on the other hand maybe it's possible that if we keep it secret wolves accidentally slip up and reveal they know too much about the pairings? hmm
Quote from: NocturneOfShadow on February 11, 2016, 03:00:36 PMthere's also a huge difference in quality between 2000 songs and 2010 songs
Quote from: Latios212 on February 11, 2016, 03:29:24 PMThe difference between 2000 songs and 2010 songs is 10 songs.

Oricorio

Quote from: ThatHiddenCharacter on March 07, 2024, 06:30:10 PMJust to be clear, we are allowed to talk to our lovers in DMs, right? (With the host included, of course.)

Yes

BlackDragonSlayer

Quote from: mastersuperfan on March 07, 2024, 06:39:56 PMon the other hand maybe it's possible that if we keep it secret wolves accidentally slip up and reveal they know too much about the pairings? hmm
Personally, I think there's merit to the plan of everyone revealing their lover, but at the same time accidental slip-ups of wolves trying to defend the human lovers of *both* wolves is likely going to be a big part of the game. If we put everything on the table there's less chance of catching such slip-ups.
And the moral of the story: Quit while you're a head.

Fakemon Dex
NSM Sprite Thread
Compositions
Story Thread
The Dread Somber

BlackDragonSlayer

In contrast, I feel like humans might actually be inclined to lynch their own lover if they genuinely believe that lover could be a wolf.

Since it's a no-nights game, we're going to be relying a lot more on reading into dynamics like this.
And the moral of the story: Quit while you're a head.

Fakemon Dex
NSM Sprite Thread
Compositions
Story Thread
The Dread Somber

SpecsFlyer17

Quote from: BlackDragonSlayer on March 07, 2024, 06:48:26 PMPersonally, I think there's merit to the plan of everyone revealing their lover, but at the same time accidental slip-ups of wolves trying to defend the human lovers of *both* wolves is likely going to be a big part of the game. If we put everything on the table there's less chance of catching such slip-ups.

It's reasonable that a given player will defend their known partner in the interest of self-preservation, which as BDS mentioned, is one person per player. However, each wolf has 3 known players to guard: the other wolf, wolf 1's lover, and wolf 2's lover.

Keeping pairings hidden for the first day, noting who attempts to defend, then revealing pairings and seeing how peoples' defenses change could yield some information. Specifically if anyone defends multiple people across days.

Idk though.
Current Breathing Mode: MANUAL

SpecsFlyer17

Also worth noting that there's a 50% chance of eliminating a wolf D1; either directly or via their lover.
Current Breathing Mode: MANUAL

ThatHiddenCharacter

I think Spec's plan has a bit more merit to it than the others, but nothing that's been said so far seems particularly wolfy to me, either.
Discord server (We have continental breakfast): https://discord.gg/ZuFJBF4

Jointers Discord server (We have continental music):
https://discord.gg/ehHWckpTzn

Ko-fi page (I have continental continents):
https://ko-fi.com/thathiddencharacter

mastersuperfan

there are 6 humans. 4 are paired with other humans and 2 are paired with wolves. given uniformly random role distribution, from a human's point of view, there's a 2/6 = 1/3 chance you're paired with a wolf.

then:
- with 1/3 probability, your lover is a wolf. thus one other pair is human-wolf, and the remaining two pairs are human-human. then lynching one of the other 3 pairs at random has a 1/3 chance of killing a wolf.
- with 2/3 probability, your lover is a human. thus two other pairs are human-wolf, and the remaining pair is human-human. then lynching one of the other 3 pairs at random has a 2/3 chance of killing a wolf.

thus lynching one of the other 3 pairs at random, in total, has a 1/3 * 1/3 + 2/3 * 2/3 = 5/9 chance of killing a wolf.

tl;dr for humans:
- if you sacrifice your own pair, there's a 33.3% chance you kill a wolf
- if you sacrifice a different pair, there's a 55.6% chance you kill a wolf

so both humans and wolves have incentives to protect themselves day 1.
Quote from: NocturneOfShadow on February 11, 2016, 03:00:36 PMthere's also a huge difference in quality between 2000 songs and 2010 songs
Quote from: Latios212 on February 11, 2016, 03:29:24 PMThe difference between 2000 songs and 2010 songs is 10 songs.

mastersuperfan

Quote from: mastersuperfan on March 07, 2024, 07:29:33 PMso both humans and wolves have incentives to protect themselves day 1.
(and their lover)
Quote from: NocturneOfShadow on February 11, 2016, 03:00:36 PMthere's also a huge difference in quality between 2000 songs and 2010 songs
Quote from: Latios212 on February 11, 2016, 03:29:24 PMThe difference between 2000 songs and 2010 songs is 10 songs.

mastersuperfan

case 1: suppose a human-wolf pair gets lynched d1. then the remaining pairs are h-w, h-h, h-h. assuming all future lynches happen uniformly at random, there's a 1/3 chance that wolves win and a 2/3 chance that humans win.

case 2: suppose a human-human pair gets lynched d1. then the remaining pairs are h-w, h-w, h-h. then under the same assumptions there's a 2/3 chance that wolves win and a 1/3 chance that humans win.

then on d1, if you are a human and you get lynched, since your lover is a wolf with 1/3 probability, the probability you win is 1/3 * 2/3 (case 1) + 2/3 * 1/3 (case 2) = 4/9 = 44.4%. if you are a wolf and you get lynched, then the probability you win is 1/3 = 33.3% (only case 1).

in theory I think this means wolves have a stronger incentive to defend themselves than humans. I was initially toying with the idea of a human volunteering to sacrifice themselves, but since the win probabilities are 50/50 initially, a human volunteering to sacrifice themselves would still benefit the wolves, since the probability of humans winning would go down from 50% to 44.4%. so for a human's pov, the ideal play d1 is not to lynch themselves or their lover.

an exception being if you have sus on your lover and think they're a wolf.
Quote from: NocturneOfShadow on February 11, 2016, 03:00:36 PMthere's also a huge difference in quality between 2000 songs and 2010 songs
Quote from: Latios212 on February 11, 2016, 03:29:24 PMThe difference between 2000 songs and 2010 songs is 10 songs.

mastersuperfan

Quote from: SpecsFlyer17 on March 07, 2024, 07:05:23 PMIt's reasonable that a given player will defend their known partner in the interest of self-preservation, which as BDS mentioned, is one person per player. However, each wolf has 3 known players to guard: the other wolf, wolf 1's lover, and wolf 2's lover.

Keeping pairings hidden for the first day, noting who attempts to defend, then revealing pairings and seeing how peoples' defenses change could yield some information. Specifically if anyone defends multiple people across days.

Idk though.

this might be interesting. a priori (before accounting for sus), each human should only have an incentive to protect one player (other than themselves), and if they don't, their win rate goes down from 50% to 44.4%. wolves have an incentive to protect three players other than themselves, and if they don't, their win rate goes down from 50% to 33.3%.

looking at this from another angle: if a human in a h-h pair is on the chopping block, both humans (2/8 players) will be opposed. if a wolf or a wolf's lover is on the chopping block, both wolves + the involved human (3/8 players) will be opposed. that's almost half the players, and so if the remaining humans aren't well coordinated, wolves could steer it away pretty easily. (of course, the process of doing so might look suspicious, depending on how conspicuous it is.)
Quote from: NocturneOfShadow on February 11, 2016, 03:00:36 PMthere's also a huge difference in quality between 2000 songs and 2010 songs
Quote from: Latios212 on February 11, 2016, 03:29:24 PMThe difference between 2000 songs and 2010 songs is 10 songs.