TWG XLVI: Have it Your Way

[Bubbles]

I didnt even read this yet XD I opened up two tabs and apparently typed in this one instead of the Pokemon one

Please?

[TheZeldaPianist275]

XD I was about to say....

And you seem to be too.

Let Bird explain... then we can vote...

That's true. Sorry.  I don't have very many suspicions right now though, and we've got to vote somebody.

[BlackDragonSlayer]

That's true. Sorry.  I don't have very many suspicions right now though, and we've got to vote somebody.

Don't be hasty now; early in the game, we can't risk something like that. Especially if Bird is a human.

[Bubbles]

Ok I read up. Waddle seems like a random choice, since I cant really think of a reason. I dont think it was Social getting revenge or someone trying to frame Social since I thought they were done fighting?

Can someone please explain to me the whole mechanics of the tracking/seering/other stuff? I thought that everyone voted because no one knew who the actual seer was, and whoever the seer voted for got seered. Apparently it doesnt matter and even if the invisible seer votes for someone, if the majority voted for someone else his vote wouldnt count?

And if one of the invisible roles dies that means no more of their powers? So we would know if we lynched/wolfed one of them? Would that be revealed that there will be no more tracking/seerings/guardings or is that kept quiet until the end of the next night phase when it isnt posted?

[BlackDragonSlayer]

Ok I read up. Waddle seems like a random choice, since I cant really think of a reason. I dont think it was Social getting revenge or someone trying to frame Social since I thought they were done fighting?

Can someone please explain to me the whole mechanics of the tracking/seering/other stuff? I thought that everyone voted because no one knew who the actual seer was, and whoever the seer voted for got seered. Apparently it doesnt matter and even if the invisible seer votes for someone, if the majority voted for someone else his vote wouldnt count?

And if one of the invisible roles dies that means no more of their powers? So we would know if we lynched/wolfed one of them? Would that be revealed that there will be no more tracking/seerings/guardings or is that kept quiet until the end of the next night phase when it isnt posted?

Everyone can vote, as long as the seer/guard/tracker is alive, I believe??

[blueflower999]

^This is correct. Once the invisible Seer/Guardian/Tracker dies, the event will stop.

[spitllama]

Maybe wolfing Waddle was a choice revenge by Social for being banned!!!

*gasp*

[Toby]

Ok I read up. Waddle seems like a random choice, since I cant really think of a reason. I dont think it was Social getting revenge or someone trying to frame Social since I thought they were done fighting?

Can someone please explain to me the whole mechanics of the tracking/seering/other stuff? I thought that everyone voted because no one knew who the actual seer was, and whoever the seer voted for got seered. Apparently it doesnt matter and even if the invisible seer votes for someone, if the majority voted for someone else his vote wouldnt count?

And if one of the invisible roles dies that means no more of their powers? So we would know if we lynched/wolfed one of them? Would that be revealed that there will be no more tracking/seerings/guardings or is that kept quiet until the end of the next night phase when it isnt posted?

The seer will only work ask long as the invisible seer is alive, everyone's vote counts, same aplies with guard and semi track.


I don't let you know if the invisible roles die, you find out next night.

[Toby]

And Bubbles, I thought you were using some scientific terms to insult my game in your poke post!!! Keeeep ittt!

[Yugi]

Maybe wolfing Waddle was a choice revenge by Social for being banned!!!

*gasp*

If I were me, I would get revenge by editing all the posts in a thread he made have the word, squidward or Gaara. It would be more smart than just wolfing him.

Safety on BDS

[BlackDragonSlayer]

I think it might be good for everybody to explain the logic behind their votes (talking about Bird mostly, at this point).
Like how, Bird, was SocialFox being weird??

[Bird]

^I wouldn't be too quick with that, Bird. Social could easily have been framed by the wolf choosing to wolf Waddle Bro. 

And Social's just always weird as a human

I may be quick to vote for him, but the two of you are also quick to defend him.

He hasn't done much, but the weird things he has done have rocketed him to the top of my suspicion list. I know it may not have been that weird, but it's weirder than anything anyone else has done. Seriously, not voting for Maestro because people would think he was voting for his master wolf partner? How obtuse is that?

[Bird]

Oh also, Bubbles, feel free to edit out your embarrassing post.

[TheZeldaPianist275]

I may be quick to vote for him, but the two of you are also quick to defend him.

He hasn't done much, but the weird things he has done have rocketed him to the top of my suspicion list. I know it may not have been that weird, but it's weirder than anything anyone else has done. Seriously, not voting for Maestro because people would think he was voting for his master wolf partner? How obtuse is that?

I'm not defending him necessarily.  Social generally tends to be weirder than most of us.  And it's day one... it's not like there's been a series of bizarre actions.

[BlackDragonSlayer]

I may be quick to vote for him, but the two of you are also quick to defend him.

He hasn't done much, but the weird things he has done have rocketed him to the top of my suspicion list. I know it may not have been that weird, but it's weirder than anything anyone else has done. Seriously, not voting for Maestro because people would think he was voting for his master wolf partner? How obtuse is that?

Ah, I see what you're trying to do: you're throwing stones in the pond and looking at what the ripples look like (e.g. doing something almost-out-of-the-ordinary and watching reactions)!
We (at least those two) are "quick" to defend him because they might not exactly see your reasoning behind the vote, which is why it might be better to include logic behind your vote.