It's not Opposite Day.
Quote from: Bloop on August 13, 2024, 04:02:47 AMAh yeah, you mean Dn sliding to Eb right? I hear it too now, changed the enharmonic spelling to be Fhalfdim too.to me it sounded like there was a Dn as well in that cluster but now I honestly can't tell.
Quote from: Bloop on July 17, 2024, 09:53:26 AM-m1-5: I hear an E instead of a D# on the bottom of the R.H. chordOh yeah I think you're right about that
Quote from: Bloop on July 17, 2024, 09:53:26 AM-m3: I hear an E in the L.H. (instead of C#)I definitely hear downward movement to the C# there. There might be some low E from the mid chords, but adding it to the LH sounds muddy and there's an E in the RH already
Quote from: Bloop on July 17, 2024, 09:53:26 AM-m5: There's a G# on beat 3 in the R.H.Ah yeah I totally missed that one
Quote from: Bloop on July 17, 2024, 09:53:26 AM-m8: Maybe you could put this 8th rest in beat 3.5 in the R.H. too? It sounds like all instruments stop playing and only some reverb continues on.Yeah that's a good call
Quote from: Bloop on July 17, 2024, 09:53:26 AM-m10: The R.H. and L.H. play the same A# on beat 3 here, maybe you could add parentheses the the one in the R.H.?Good call, I didn't notice that doubling
Quote from: Bloop on July 17, 2024, 09:53:26 AM-m18, 22 and 26: I hear an A instead of a B in the L.H. on beat 2I'm still not completely sure that the harp even plays a note there. I was extrapolating from the B's in beat 1, but I like A better because it doubles with the RH and sounds more open like the feeling I get from the original harp
Quote from: Bloop on July 17, 2024, 09:53:26 AM-m31: I hear an E in the L.H. in beat 3.75 (below the chord on beat 1 in the next bar). Also, maybe it's easier for the L.H. to take the dyads in beat 2 (and maybe 2.5)? The run on beat 1 walks up to it nicely.I think the same E plays on beat 3 also, which would make for a lot of jumping around with the LH if you gave it the dyads too. I moved the dyads into the RH on m32 beat 1 also to fit with this thought.
Quote from: Bloop on July 17, 2024, 09:53:26 AM-For m17-30, usually you wouldn't use 8vas in the L.H., as they get a bit counterintuitive to interpret, and in this case, some parts still go up pretty high above the L.H. It's better to switch between bass and treble clef if needed. Maybe you could also check if the R.H. can take over some runs at the end of a measure, so the L.H. has time to jump back down to the bass note on beat 1 of each measure.The spread of these arpeggios is so wide that I can't find a really good way to write them. With clefs you end up with clef switches every beat and much more cramped bars. And if you add the cross-staff handing it ends up with a wacky amount of context switching. Maybe pianists can just do that? A smooth line of ottava'ed arpeggios makes a lot more sense to me, but with that approach you do lose some clarity with hand prescription. I've uploaded both options to the "Older files" Dropbox folder for comparison, but used your clef suggestion as the main folder's version. I'd be happy to hear others' thoughts about these and other possible approaches.
Quote from: Latios212 on August 25, 2024, 10:00:48 AMMainland Port/Aquarium/Theater- Oh how odd, no idea how that happened. Re-entering them worked though, done!
- Make sure the F's in the melody in m. 1/2/5/6 are flipped upwards and horizontally aligned (probably just delete and re-enter them)
- There's an E in the harmony of m. 9 beat 1 (similar to m. 8 beat 1 that you already have written in)
Quote from: Latios212 on August 25, 2024, 10:00:48 AMMainland Port/Aquarium/TheaterIn this case, I would consider it part of the title. Wikipedia, Moby Games, and the game's cover art all include it, as well as the Japanese title (牧場物語GB3).
Also quick question, is "GBC" part of the title of the game? We list the consoles of the games on site now, so is it necessary to include as part of the title?
Quote from: RaraCool on August 26, 2024, 06:05:08 PMFinale has been discontinued, you are no longer able to purchase it from MakeMusic, and will only be supported for a year from today, after which it will be impossible to install on devices, even with a license.We've been talking about this in the Discord server since the news dropped this morning. On the staff side of things, we're still working out the exact details (and hope to have more news soon!!!), but the tentative announcement is that we'll try to be software-agnostic while also trying to maintain visual consistency with the sheets as much as possible. The Finale announcement is basically expediting changes we were already planning to work out in the distant future. User input is always appreciated.
As someone who does not make compositions, I'm curious whether proposed alternatives (recreations of Finale in Musescore), are comprehensive enough at this point to fully replace Finale for the purposes of this site?
Page created in 0.151 seconds with 16 queries.