NinSheetMusic is 18 years old!
Quote from: Kricketune54 on August 26, 2024, 10:43:13 AM• On the whole I think some of the measure systems could be a little less wide. Main goal being that there's not a single system on the final page. I would play around a bit but maybe there's a page or two you could manage 6 measure systems.I was able to cut it down to 5 systems per page (page 2 and onwards).
Quote• Given all the hidden pedal marks is there a reason there's no con pedale direction?No reason in particular. I keep forgetting to include con pedale lol
Quote• m7 1.75 Not hearing a note/"The", sounds like "Final day" lyric on beat two is the start just like m5The lyrics has been taken from the official OST booklet (which I have). This site has the lyrics taken from the booklet. For the first point, the "The" in <The final day has come to an end> has been eliminated. The singer doesn't appear to pronounce the word despite it being in the official lyrics. However for the second point, I left the "I" in <I will trace back all the memories>. It sounds like it could go either way, but I personally prefer to use the official one.
• m13 4.75 lyric is "You" not "I"
Quote• m3 4.5-4.75 technically it's more a gliss/slide from the En, you could do two 16th grace notes, Gn and G# leading to m4's An.I think I fixed this. I messaged you via Discord. If needed, I will adjust accordingly.
Quote from: Kricketune54 on August 28, 2024, 01:21:58 PMBumping for arranger as it's been over a month since I left feedback and we generally try to move the projects on a bit more of a fixed timelineSorry, work has been hectic lately, we've been understaffed. I've updated the file now, though!
Quote from: Kricketune54 on July 26, 2024, 07:54:50 AM• m15 RH there is a Fn above the notes currently on beat 1.33, and I don't hear the AbThis is the only particular note I disagree with, though I do believe what I had was also a bit incorrect. I'm pretty sure the harpsichord is playing a (each pair listed in descending order) Bb-G, Bb-Ab, Bb-D, then Ab-C on the offbeats. It's also an octave higher than I originally had it. So I adjusted that accordingly, still including the flute bit in there as well, of course.
Quote from: Th3Gavst3r on August 27, 2024, 04:03:10 PMI definitely hear downward movement to the C# there. There might be some low E from the mid chords, but adding it to the LH sounds muddy and there's an E in the RH alreadyAh yeah I can hear it in the harp now. The E is probably there in the synth strings choir pad thingy, which kinda overshadows it after beat 1, but yeah no need to put it in the L.H. ^^
Quote from: Th3Gavst3r on August 27, 2024, 04:03:10 PMThe spread of these arpeggios is so wide that I can't find a really good way to write them. With clefs you end up with clef switches every beat and much more cramped bars. And if you add the cross-staff handing it ends up with a wacky amount of context switching. Maybe pianists can just do that? A smooth line of ottava'ed arpeggios makes a lot more sense to me, but with that approach you do lose some clarity with hand prescription. I've uploaded both options to the "Older files" Dropbox folder for comparison, but used your clef suggestion as the main folder's version. I'd be happy to hear others' thoughts about these and other possible approaches.I think what you have right now is good: the clef switching isn't really a problem to read (for me at least), I believe it happens more often for wide arpeggios like these. The cross-staffing looks good too cuz it's always after one of the dyads in the R.H., so the player can see from those in which octave they need to play too. Only thing I noticed was that in m20 and 28, the D in beat 2 is played in both hands. Maybe you can add parentheses to the L.H. one, and cross-staff the one in beat 2.75 too since it's in the R.H. anyway?
Quote from: Fernman on July 23, 2024, 09:26:59 PMI like the intro now, should the pedal be held in 2 measure increments?One pedal throughout works too if you want!
Quote from: Fernman on July 23, 2024, 09:26:59 PMin m4, I had put beat 4 of the LH in the RH so the LH had more time jump to the FnBoth have their advantages and disadvantages. I personally would prefer keeping beat 4 in the L.H. and having the player decide for themself if they wanna play it in the L.H., but this way works too.
Quote from: Fernman on July 23, 2024, 09:26:59 PMI'll defer to whatever you think is best since you know notation better.I think I'd personally go to shrinking the notehead then ^^
Quote from: Fernman on July 23, 2024, 09:26:59 PMSeparate question: can I substitute "Sunny Beach" for "Options Menu" from Wave Race? Even though submissions are closed?Since submissions are closed we won't be accepting substitute submissions, sorry!
if not, that's fine.
Quote from: Kricketune54 on August 28, 2024, 01:41:51 PM• m24-m27 beat 2.0 LH I was looking at this again, is there a reason to have beat 2 and 3 raised like that?Yeah, I wanted to indicate the RH play those notes. I kept those notes attached to the lower staff just because it felt more consistent with the voices being played. I do think that it'll be fine to change though if desired.
Quote from: Kricketune54 on August 28, 2024, 01:41:51 PMTook a while to digest this one but I think that's all of my commentaryThanks for taking the time to tackle a hard piece!
Quotem20 and m28 unsure what to change about inner notesOn the inner notes - I meant that it's typically easier to play multiple notes at the start of a phrase than on beat 2 for example (looking at current m19). But also, having a chord at the start of a measure when it is heard in the original source at the start just makes sense from a setting the chord tone and accuracy standpoint. So at m17 for example beat 1 in the RH would be spelled out as An-En-Cn-An
Page created in 0.084 seconds with 14 queries.