Messages

I'd love to play, but I'm starting college soon and don't want this game to interfere; I'll come back and play once I adapt to my new schedule, though.

sadface

[Dude]

I'm going to go Dude on this one. That post he made about Wrydryn hasn't sat well with me all phase.

Damn, such a short day phase. I like to take my time.

Well, drpamplemousse, I understand your reasoning if you are looking for a candidate to safety, but SFK already had a vote on him. If day were to end now, he would die, just because he had two "safeties." Also, just because SFK hasn't been on yet doesn't mean he is necessarily a human. True, he couldn't have sent in the wolf pm, but there are other wolves to do it, and SFK could be a wolf who just hasn't been online yet.

ew MST

I'll play.

I side with Kefka on this one. Probably an 8/10 or so.

[askalice23]

So basically I'm going to expand upon the same things I said before.

So, no wolf kill last night. This could be one of two things: a framing, or inactive wolf/wolves remaining.

Let's not discredit the idea of purposefully missing a wolfing here, guys. It's a perfectly plausible strategy under the right conditions.

Let's say there are two wolves left. Given that this happened night four, there would have to be two wolves left for the strategy to be effective.

If the wolves wolf someone regularly, they are down to 5 players. They need to convince the remaining humans to lynch a human, though, and this could be a difficult task.

If the wolves don't wolf someone, they remain at 6 players. However, the lack of a wolfing is, theoretically, an easy path to lynching an inactive human. Then, the wolves would just need one more wolfing (easy, given that the guardian is dead) to win.

Under these conditions, which are quite possible, a wolf skipping a wolfing is the better plan. The question is, are these conditions met?

First, we would need two wolves left. I'm not sure, given the dynamics between players, if I can see two wolves left. But it's still possible.

But is there some one inactive enough? Jamaha is the most logical choice, but he does check the site every day. However, this doesn't necessarily mean he checks TWG every day. Another choice is askalice23, who seems to post sporadically. He would have reason to vote Jamaha, another inactive player, quickly for forgetting to send in a wolf pm.

I'm going to put a vote on askalice23 for now and see what developments happen.

JaMaHa has been doing little to nothing all game, so all signs point to him.

However, it could be a framing--an active player doesn't send in a kill, knowing the humans will lynch the inactive player (as MG and I almost did last game). Now, the wolves would only do this if they were within striking distance of victory, aka 2 wolves left. If the wolves didn't send in a night kill, they could get an easy lynch on Jamaha, a free wolfing, and then a team of 2 wolves left would win the game. This is a better situation than a wolfing, then having to dodge another day's lynching in order to win.

The catch is I find it hard to believe that there are 2 wolves left.

Silly MaestroUGC

Unfortunately I missed all the fun.

I'm too lazy to go on NSM

Yes yes, I am a green, and now that ETF has confirmed me I'd love for you guys to come confer with me.

"Posted on: Today at 10:59:46 PM Posted by: kotorfanboy"

RESPECT IT, MG

[Concerto]

that is a vote Concerto

Concerto hoshit out of time

ETF, what were the seering results from last night?

(to everyone else) Generally, we make the results of the seering public, so that the humans can narrow their pool of possible wolves.