Messages

how was I wrong about him being olimar

Aww come on did ya'll really think wolf partners suck each others dicks day one.

That's really odd that you got mixed up on that, so did you and your partner not communicate on your thoughts on waluigi?

That was my first post and action of the game, so no? We did talk about waluigi soon there after.

I got it mixed up becuase I legitamently did not remember being a part of the talk between heads discussion, so because my partner and I just kind of post when we want to without consulting eachother first, I just assumed it was one of his posts I forgot about. My memory was jogged because I spent the entirety of yesterday really confused why he said that since when we first contacted eachtother (shortly after that post) the first thing he talked about was wanting to lynch waluigi.

Tbh, at the end of the day there's no excuse for forgetting my own posts so it's really just my bad. Sorry.

[There was talk during day 2 (and even day 1) about how Haruhi/Ness was a strong possibility for wolf pairing. Since the game didn't end, and Ness and Waluigi were incompatible as partners, that left two possibilities: Haruhi was a human, or Waluigi was a human. We established during day 1 that Waluigi was potentially a bad human that the wolves could hide behind, and with Ness's claim seeming so scummy, it suddenly seemed possible that the wolf pair could actually be Haruhi/Ness. If that pairing hadn't been previously discussed, we would've had much more reason to trust Ness after the game continued. Obviously the chances of Waluigi being the wolf were higher, but there was so little information to glean from Haruhi's actions that it couldn't be ruled out.]

Sorry, was really busy last night from 7  to 3 so I missed all of this. Anyway,

There was talk during day 2 (and even day 1) about how Haruhi/Ness was a strong possibility for wolf pairing. Since the game didn't end, and Ness and Waluigi were incompatible as partners, that left two possibilities: Haruhi was a human, or Waluigi was a human. We established during day 1 that Waluigi was potentially a bad human that the wolves could hide behind, and with Ness's claim seeming so scummy, it suddenly seemed possible that the wolf pair could actually be Haruhi/Ness. If that pairing hadn't been previously discussed, we would've had much more reason to trust Ness after the game continued. Obviously the chances of Waluigi being the wolf were higher, but there was so little information to glean from Haruhi's actions that it couldn't be ruled out.

Actually, Ness+Haruhi was practically impossible the instant Ness claimed. There is only one way this could have happened: if Link was the seer and he didn't tell anyone about his green check, which is the exact same thing Ness appeared to do. The only logical thing that could have let Ness be a wolf is if either Haruhi was the green check and Link the seer, or the other way around. The only likely way for this to happen is for one of them to blab to a wolf, but I don't think either would be stupid enough. That's why I wrote my list of 4 possibilities. I never included Ness+Haruhi  because the chance of that was infinitely small. This is why we were the first to vote for waluigi.

oh wait this post was mine not blue pikas sorry, was my first post of the game

Everyone alive right now besides you has defended Waluigi at some point, although my other never talked highly about him in private discussions. This is starting to really stress me out so I'll just leave you with this and be done.

Samus defended Waluigi in an indirect way, I did so in a blatant way. Which method is a wolf is more likely to employ? Based on how I'm playing, do you think I'm the kind of player who would create an obvious public partnership with my wolf partner and then throw the game by lynching him day two? Is Waluigi more likely to not publically interact with his partner or publically call them the only sensible person in the game?

and this one lol

Me. I think I learned about card flips when people were talking about it day 1 but I honestly don't remember.

blue if first, I'm second

Oh, well Waluigi was Olimar ezpz

^replace defense with death in that last sentence

[If I were to wrap up my argument:]

hey pikachu, who do you think any of the two waluigi players really were?

We´re not allowed to publically say who they are (?) but I will say I knew exactly who the wah waluigi was when the salt shaker meme came through. Anyways, it's not important because it's irrelevant to the point that he was constantly berating you whilst completely ignoring samus. It's a pretty dead giveaway.

pika, why are you only just now making your posts different based on the player posting them

I started on page 8:

I suppose I'll post in this color, but I think distinguishing between the two heads ruins what makes this game fun and unique. Without the ambiguity of combined accounts, it's mostly just a regular TWG (with the bonus of inactivty reading! Yay....)

I also didn't think the benefit to humans was minimal and not some huge "we must implement this strategy to win!" I'm a bit more serious doing this phase than the previous phase so our individual heads can respond seperately and clearly.

If I were to wrap up my argument:
1. Read through day two and our argument today about it. Remember, this phase was a potential LYLO.
2. My two heads behaved as seperate people with seperate opinions, samus is acting as one unit (humans want their individual voices heard, wolves don't care and may think trying to avoiding contradicting eachother makes them look more human?) Hell, they refer to literally everything they've ever done with "we", not "I."
3. The difference in the way Waluigi treated you and Samus for doing very similar things.

Pika's most recent post

[close]

Seeing as I am running on very little sleep, forgive the denseness in my response. I am sincerely attempting to understand your second point, but it is quite the source of confusion. Could you perhaps explain it without the sarcasm so I may comprehend? Also do bear in mind that the post you linked to in your first point is merely stating and explaining suspicion of Ness, while simultaneously expressing our support for the lynching of the wolf, Waluigi. We were suspicious of both, however, seeing as we're playing in the human interest, we supported the lynch that was most sensible. Although not quite the same, this situation is compared to that of your own early on, when you made known your suspicions of both Haruhi and Ness, claiming you did not care which one died in the day one lynch. While we did care who died (Waluigi), we were openly making our case against the other, as Ness (and Waluigi early on in the game especially) made the case against Waluigi. As such, there was no need to make a post of rivalling length against Waluigi compared to our Ness claim, as it would only have been redundant and rather pointless.

Us voting Waluigi is the worst thing a wolf pikachu could of done that phase. You're accusing me of misplay claiming it was an obvious wolf move, and that makes no sense. Sure, if Ness was practically unlynchable, it could of been my way distancing myself from him before his inevitable defense. However, to defend yourself about that iffy d2 post, you inadvertantely pointed out that Ness was indeed lynchable.

Completely honest, I suck at guessing who is who in mystery games. I got nothing. I'd probably guess someone inexperienced because they played pretty badly. Not as badly as haruhi, though.

[Samus]

Fair enough. Sorry for not posting. I suggested this to my other head, but he turned it down and said samus and our votes are kinda meaningless because luigi's the only one that matters.
Anyhoo, Samus

(is that bold enough for you, brainy)

Ness admitted himself that he forgot that having a green check meant he could set up an alliance. I don't think it's too much of a stretch to think that a potentially different seer could have also forgotten to claim to their human, who then wouldn't know to counterclaim a false seer. Ness's claims were still incredibly safe ones; jumping from defending Waluigi as soon as Ness posted seems too safe.

Waluigi was on everybody's lynch list day 2. When you've spent all of day 1 saying his lynch is a bad idea, turning your vote around day 2 would be the best way to distance yourself from him. Since you voted first, that means you could show your distrust of Waluigi without making it too close to actually killing him. Taking the vote off after everybody agreed to lynch him would've looked way too suspicious.

Alrighty, I think you've made a slip and we've got a checkmate. You claim:

Quote 1: This is you trying to justify you deflecting suspicion onto Ness while trying to avoiding buddying with Waluigi by making it look like being Ness' error made him look extremely wolfy and your suspicion was not an unfounded attempt to save your partner.

Quote 2: You say this to as a point to make me look like a wolf... but hey! Look what you said in point one, Ness was a suspicios dude and therefore a viable lynch target! Ooooh, I also aready had the precedent of thinking Waluigi was human, and thinking Ness was the last wolf. But wait, there's more - if I lynch Ness that phase, I win the game! You know what would of been a great move, trying to get Ness lynched. But you know what I did instead? I brought up a point no one had said yet trying to confirms Ness' humanity to start a waluigi lynch so that way no one will think I could possibly be his partner! The best part is that people are so suspicios of Ness that they'll lynch him anyways and my partner won't die so I guess nothing I did mattered anyways! Ahuhuhuhu~excuse my sarcasm

Obviously our move greatly helped the humans (also admittedly our only good move this game), so which is it? Was Ness a viable lynch target I could of pushed for or were you wrong to try and throw shade on him? Or maybe I'm just stupid and distancing was totally the best move in that situation, but that's for luigi to decide.

-not sure how to provide quotes for the first point since its referencing every single one of waluigi's posts
-point 2 see blue pikas post
-point 3 see my first post this phase
-point 4 is pretty much everything samus has said, but the same quote for point 3 is a pertinent example of them acting as one unit of thought.

I've been procrastinating homework long enough, but if you want more meat on any of these I'll be happy to oblige.