Messages

It kills me--literally--that I'm gonna die because people are not active.

I am a human, that's all I have to say--someone framed me and you all are making it very easy for him.

Now if the psychic knows if #6 was a wolf my vote will change because there would be no reason for a wolf to want to kill a wolf. This will also prove you're human.

The Psychic can't determine roles, that is a Seer and there is not one this game; secondly, if you think the nonexistent Seer would have claimed just to save my butt you would be seriously mistaken. I wouldn't even want that; it would be a very risky move.

The humans have very nearly lost--or, in some cases, actually lost--several times because they are unable to see the LOGIC.

If I was pissed off at someone and it was blatantly obvious, like my earlier irritation at twgplayer10, it would be a horrible move to wolf that person. The only way this kind of thing happens, besides an accident from a stupid wolf, is obviously to form a SETUP.

Please bear with me on this.

[twgplayer10]

As for my defense on number 2--I'm not good with reverse reverse psychology. Nice idea though.

twgplayer10

[twgplayer10]

Okay, so obviously someone is trying to frame me by eliminating the person I was irritated at. Or they were irritated by him as well.

The logical choice here would be twgplayer10; he has not given much defense and all he has done was vote for the person who accused him.

I kinda said I wasn't, but whatever >_>

Ugh, just like you, Universe. Try reading the thread before you post so that you actually understand what people are talking about.

CRAP. Wow, I knew I was gonna do that.

Don't tell anybody.

Ban me if you need to MG--I just posted with my actual account by accident. Then I removed my post.

It said--

I can't prove anything either, only the psychic can do that--but it would be foolish to this early in the game.

CRAP CRAP CRAP CRAP CRAP PLEASE DON'T BAN ME IT WAS AN ACCIDENT

Also, that's got to be the most lack of evidence I've ever given. If you're really human, please give some proof or reason if you can.

*ever BEEN given lol

Also, that's got to be the most lack of evidence I've ever given. If you're really human, please give some proof or reason if you can.

If you had read, you'd know that that means he forgot that he couldn't reveal his identity, which he did, so he's now banned for five games. Someone insta this guy already.

I would rather we lynch an inactive human than chance it and lynch an active one.

Thank you. Although it's taking a chance lynching anybody, really.

I was going to vote for player6... but I don't want to insta them out just yet...

Which makes me suspicious of you. I am still not so sure you're human.  What was the reasoning again?

All I care about is that my mom remembers to get me a CR2025 battery tomorrow... I really want to play my Silver!

Hmm, one more vote signifies an insta. :|

I was just going to say something like that... actually, though, just saying that 6 may not be a wolf doesn't NECESSARILY give us reason to be suspicious... and, having already eaten Thanksgiving food, I can't eat any food for thought, only give it.

However, 10 is being rather suspicious. Let's look at his post.

I don't know if no one wolfing means #6 is a wolf. The wolves may want us to think that.

Hmm...that seems highly unlikely. To actually miss a wolfing...as twgplayer8 said, that is taking a very big blow. It's strange to suggest that. I don't know why you would suggest this if you were human--nor if you were a wolf, but it's more likely.

It also may be a factor of they didn't know who to lynch because we don't know who is who.

That doesn't make sense, unless they have some really serious grudge problems. That seems like something of a (lame) cover-up to me.

As of right now #6 is a big suspicion, however I think I will hold off on my vote.

That doesn't make sense--if he was really a "big" suspicion, then I'm pretty sure you would vote for him.

Also, know this--by no means am I accusing 10 of being a wolf. I'm just pointing out that his post right there was very odd and off-color, and I would be interested to hear some plausible reasons why he is not a wolf.

BTW, MG said he was going to sign in using our accounts. So "Who's Online" is not always reliable.

Just tried to post, but new reply--he just posted the same thing, lol.

twgplayer9, by claiming, you have gotten yourself banned in following games. I have censored what you said. It would appear as if only one person has seen it. As long as they don't share what happened, I'm going to try to let this game continue. Let's not screw up a good twg by not being able to read the rules.

I won't tell, don't worry.

[twgplayer6]

Well, I wish I could vote for twgplayer8 or 1, but no. 9 is right--they are probably human. :|

Now--here's a giveaway. NO ONE WAS WOLFED. Which means that the wolves either could not decide, or, more likely, WERE NOT ACTIVE.

twgplayer4 left early, and twgplayer6 has had no posts.

For this reason I'm agreeing with no. 9 and voting twgplayer6.

About my earlier lynch ideas--I was going to say that we should vote off player1 because of his lack of helpfulness, and if not for those points you just said I probably would have voted for either him or twgplayer8 for the same reason. Those were my "lynch ideas", not really anything big.

Also, I don't think you should have claimed your identity. That makes us see you in a different way.