Messages

• m10 LH 4.0 hearing Dn under here as well

You're right.

• m12 RH 4.5 hearing this C and the Bn in m13 up an octave. You could pull up m16 and m17 same spots as well, but I do understand if you want to keep this as is.

I spent some time debating whether it was an octave higher or not, but came to the conclusion that it sounds more like it's just a change in the shehnai's timbre as it goes into its lower register. I've messed around a bit with shehnai sounds in the past, and it does do that as it gets lower. Well, it's either a shehnai or a zurna, but both kinda do that same thing either way.

Files are updated.

• m25 the time signature changes to "C", usually try to be consistent and having this written as 4/4 if that's what was used previously at the start of the sheet.

Oops, I didn't catch that. Thanks for pointing it out, I hate inconsistencies like that as well.

• The top system on page 2 looks a tad high, though you could lower page 3 as well to be consistent.

Oof, that was an issue with my other submission as well, and I forgot to apply those changes to this one.

Files are updated!

in the future could you please make any copy paste posts you do from Discord or elsewhere more readable?

I'm sorry, that was my attempt to make it readable.

I still disagree on this but we can table for next updater.

Sounds fair.

• m15 LH I don't hear a note on 3.0 (Dn)

You're right, relistening I can tell it was one of the drums I was hearing there.

m24 LH 1.5 the lower Gn is a bit awkward to play, you could remove it without losing much imo

I assume you mean 1.25, and I agree.

I've made all the changes, I believe. Other than the one we're waiting for another updater for.

EDIT: I also just noticed that there was an invisible dynamic from the XML import this entire time that I had missed. I fixed it as well.

I think I realized what happened. These are older arrangements of mine, so it's very likely I made them with the old template I had which doesn't fit some of the current standards for submissions. Does it look better now?

I knew as soon as I saw I died that msf was in contact with the Paper vigi and I screwed myself over. And as he already pointed out, I had a feeling I had vigi'd one of my teammates. Not that it mattered since K-NiGhT also targeted davy. Gg, everyone, this was a good game. Congrats, Paper!

Missed this too?

What, no. I did move them down. Quite a bit, too.

Skimming through everything else, I think the rest of my comments were addressed, except this one:

How correct you are.

I have updated the files.

Also, not to be that guy, but I don't remember being able to leak DMs back in the day.

Depends on the game. If not explicitly stated to be disallowed, DMs can be shared. At least, that's how it was when I started playing here.

[Oricorio]

There hasn't been a whole lot of discussion to go off of, but I personally don't trust Oricorio. He's been claiming different teams to almost everyone, if not everyone, and seems to be trying to sway people. While it's not a lot to go off of, I don't find anyone else more worthy of being voted, since the only way I could see Oricorio not being bad news is if he's on my team, which I sincerely doubt. He also claimed to me (and at least one other person who I will not currently divulge) that davy claimed Scissors Vigilante to him in PMs. Admittedly, it was before davy died that he said that to me, but I find it odd that davy would make a full claim to him with no backing. So I don't really believe it. Anyway, that's basically my reasoning for voting Oricorio.

I'm not laying low, I've just been asleep and/or at work for most of the phase. I have been somewhat active in PMs, as well. Let me get on my computer and then I'll give my thoughts.

I didn't know the game had started. Looks like I made it before phase end, at least. Lemme catch up on the rules real quick.

I've updated the files, but I did have a lot of disagreements that I (stupidly) posted in the Discord. I'm just copying them to here.

• prior to m20 RH there's a very cool strings 16th run up at the end of m19. You could add this, or just add like an Fn grace note to m20 RH 1.0.
Would something like this be acceptable? (see screenshot)
Obviously with cleaning up the layer situation (I might just change the G's on b1 to half notes and b3 in layer 2 to quarter notes so that everything can be on one layer)

• m21 LH 3.0 hearing this Fn down an octave like m18
Listening to the song pitched up an octave (since that's really the only way to make out the bass in this one), it sounds distinctly an octave higher than the other Fs.

• m23 LH I hear for the .5 value of every note, a 16th length restrike of the first pitch (ex. on beat 1.5 hearing Gn, 2.5 hearing G#)
I'm not hearing that at all. The only thing I hear that could sound like that is the arpeggio synth in the background, but not the bass itself.

• m28 LH hearing this a bit differently (see screenshot)
I disagree, it clearly sounds like the D# is the held note on beat 2, not the Bb on beat 1.75. I will agree about the C being held on beat 2.75, though, and will fix that.

m34 RH 1st layer 3.75 is slightly forward of the Db above it. Can reset position.
That's because it's beat 3.5, not beat 3.75.
The harmony instrument strikes just before the strings melody

m36 LH I think this starts on a Db and goes down to a Dn
I don't believe it really has much in the way of pitch, I've just done Eb since it closes off the melody that would have hit an Eb chord

 m42 4.75 this staccato is still too close
Cause there's no notes on 4.75 in this measure
Actually, there's no notes on 4.75 in any nearby measures except for m44, which doesn't have a staccato there
Never mind, that's not the case
Not sure what's happening with the m42 comment, then

I normally would've just waited to say all this stuff in the thread after I've updated the files, but since I'm going to be waiting for a couple other things for both this and Screwbot Factory, I figured I'd bring them up here so that they can be cleared up in the meantime
I'm going to assume you meant m43 beat 4.5

Otherwise, anything not mentioned, I did. I also just realized that I think you say beat x.75 when you mean beat x.5 a lot. Cause that would explain a lot of the points that don't make sense because there aren't notes on beat x.75 in those places.

Alright, I've decided to keep thing consistent and accurate, since it sounds perfectly fine to me, I'm keeping them as C's. If that becomes a sticking point, I'm willing to discuss it more, but for now I feel it's the best course of action. I believe the only other note of Lat's that I disagreed with was

- In measure 10 beat 3.5 LH, I'm not sure I hear the F-F# there? It also sounds a bit muddy above the D bass that low. Conversely, I do hear a C# grace note you could write in the right hand.

because that note is from the glurpy synth that plays in those sections, and I still don't think it really sounds that muddy.

Otherwise, I believe everything should be updated fine. Still navigating my recent PC disaster.

I hear Cn in the instances I pointed out for Screwbot 2 but they sound like Bn's here. In my opinion they should be Cn's in Screwbot 2 because they are literally audible as such and here I understand the reasoning for making them Bn's.

I still hear them as C's here, but the reasoning behind making them Bn's in this one also applies to Screwbot Factory 2, since Lat's point was about the major 7th sounding muddy at that octave. Personally, I think the major 7th sounds fine. Either way, since Lat's critique applies to both sheets, I would still like to keep them consistent with each other since I hear them as the same notes in both songs using AudioStretch.

Oh no worries! Sorry about the disconnect, I agree with you they should be consistent. Lemme poke Kricketune and see

Yeah, something similar happened with Micro-Row and Micro-Row 2 (except I didn't have them submitted at the same time), and it's bother me ever since that there's a disconnect.

VGMDB has the same info.

Yeah, that's the site I was talking about. It used to specify, but they seem to have changed it.