Messages

there. i submitted a 2hu sheet

Somewhat tricky, but not too hard to check.

woah updoot

- What do you think of the LH part going from m. 10 to m. 11 (and similar places)? The low notes want to resolve to the D above the C#, but it jumps up.

This is a very good point, but I'm not quite sure what to do with it myself. Adding the lower D without removing the higher one make it difficult to play, while removing the top D screws up the other three notes, and moving them all down sounds a bit too bassy for my liking.

- Copyright info is quite close to the bottom of the page.

Are you sure? I've had the copyright text moved up a bit like that in another sheet but I was told to lower it down to where it is about now. (Doesn't seem very close on the pdf either...)

- Staccato on wrong side of note in m. 20
- Would suggest removing the lower F# at the beginning of m. 32.

Oops, and good idea. Thanks.

- Not really a fan of the gliss at the end of m. 32, but here it's pretty simple to interpret what to do so it's alright I guess.

It's a bit weird, yeah.

Fixed with those edits.

[compound time]

welp this was good for reaffirming my knowledge

I've always thought that dotted notes with staccatos were acceptable in compound time specifically. I would not put that in a simple time piece. Latios just actually bothered to explain it fully (thanks man!). I was struggling quite a bit trying to explain my own thoughts in my head, that I never posted about it, hehe.

Also because I find both the 8th + quarter rest, and the quarter + 8th rest set up confusing (I tried both, and they're definitely not appropriate for this piece, especially if you know the minigame), I'm just going to avoid it altogether, and so the files are updated as how they originally were.

Note lengths =/= articulation. Likewise, a staccato dotted quarter note isn't the same as a quarter note and an eighth rest.

I've always thought this too.

For reference, here is the sheet with the dotted notes + staccatos.

I'm not a huge fan of how it looks now, and I'm still not really convinced by the staccato-dotted-note argument, but it's updated with the suggestion regardless.

Very sorry for the extremely late reply, but I won't have enough free time for this until Friday afternoon, and I need a decent amount of time to work with the feedback without it looking horrendous (to my eyes, anyway).

I really want to say that this is normal but I'm honestly not sure what's going on right now.

I want to know if these details are more detailed?

You betcha! They're the detailedest details that ever detailed.

how am i expected to redefine perfection

Yeah what a ride.

Files should be updated. Thanks.

Sorry for the wait. Files should be updated now.

Something feels kinda off about M.22, but I'll leave it.

Should be updated with Maelstrom's feedback. Thanks.